05/08/2011 - Osama Bin Laden is dead. But not recently dead. Based on evidence I believe that Osama Bin Laden has been dead for several years and that the government has concocted the recent kill story to tie up loose ends. The U.S. government needed to make the world believe that Bin Laden was still alive to give them an excuse to stay in Afghanistan and Pakistan to continue what ever corrupt agenda the U.S. government has. Now that the U.S. government no longer needs Osama Bin Laden as an excuse to be in (or stay in) Afghanistan and Pakistan they have decided it is a good time to kill him off. Not really kill him off since he was already dead but more or less write him out of the story like an actor from a tv series.
Objective Evidence that Bin Laden has been dead for several years
The objective evidence includes the following facts:
First read: 30 FACTS ABOUT OSAMA BIN LADEN
First, up until mid-December 13, 2001, the CIA had regularly been intercepting messages between bin Laden and his people. At that time, however, the messages suddenly stopped, and the CIA has never again intercepted a message.
Second, on December 26, 2001, a leading Pakistani newspaper published a story reporting that bin Laden had died in mid-December, adding:
“A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement . . . stated . . . that he had himself attended the funeral of bin Laden and saw his face prior to burial.” (Fox News Article)
Third, bin Laden had kidney disease. He had been treated for it in the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001, at which time he reportedly ordered two dialysis machines to take home. If you have ever wondered what bin Laden was doing the night before the 9/11 attacks, CBS News reported that he was being given kidney dialysis treatment in a hospital in Pakistan. And in January of 2001, Dr. Sanjay Gupta said – based on a video of bin Laden that had been made in either late November or early December of 2001 – that he appeared to be in the last stages of kidney failure.
Fourth, In July of 2002, CNN reported that bin Laden’s bodyguards had been captured in February of that year, adding: “Sources believe that if the bodyguards were captured away from bin Laden, it is likely the most-wanted man in the world is dead.”
Fifth, the United States has since 2001 offered a $25 million reward for any information leading to the capture or killing of bin Laden. But this reward offer has produced no such information, even though Pakistan has many desperately poor people, only about half of whom have been supportive of bin Laden.
Testimonial Evidence that Bin Laden Is Dead
In addition to this objective evidence, we had considerable testimony in 2002, from people in position to know, that bin Laden was dead, or probably so. These people included:
• President Musharraf of Pakistan;
• Dale Watson, the head of the FBI’s counterterrorism unit;
• Oliver North, who said: “I’m certain that Osama is dead. . . And so are all the other guys I stay in touch with”;
• President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan;
• Sources within Israeli intelligence, who said that any new messages from bin Laden were “probably fabrications”;
• Sources within Pakistani intelligence, who “confirmed the death of . . . Osama Bin Laden” and “attributed the reasons behind Washington’s hiding news on the death of Osama Bin Laden to the desire of the hawks of the American administration to use the issue of al-Qaida and international terrorism to invade Iraq.”
For this reason, perhaps, the stories about the demise of bin Laden largely came to an end in the latter part of 2002, when the United States was gearing up for its attack on Iraq. From then until now, there have been few such stories.
Recently, however, two former intelligence officers have spoken out. In October 2008, former CIA case officer Robert Baer suggested in passing during an interview on National Public Radio that bin Laden was no longer among the living. When Baer was asked about this, he said: “Of course he’s dead.”
In March of 2009, former Foreign Service officer Angelo Codevilla published an essay in the American Spectator entitled “Osama bin Elvis.” Explaining his title, Codevilla wrote: “Seven years after Osama bin Laden’s last verifiable appearance among the living, there is more evidence for Elvis’s presence among us than for his.”
This is an excellent article, with only one serious flaw. In 2007, Benazir Bhutto, being interviewed by David Frost, referred to Omar Sheikh as “the man who murdered Osama bin Laden.” Codevilla cited this statement as further evidence that bin Laden is dead. But Bhutto had simply misspoken: She had meant to say “the man who murdered Daniel Pearl,” which is the standard way of referring to Omar Sheikh. That she misspoke was shown the next day, when she told CNN: “I don’t think General Musharaf personally knows where Osama bin Laden is.” Ten days later, speaking to NPR, she reported having asked a policeman assigned to guard her house: “Shouldn’t you be looking for Osama bin Laden?” This flaw aside, Codevilla’s article provides good support for his claim that the widespread belief in bin Laden’s continued existence is not backed up by evidence.
Bin Laden in 1998
2002: Sceptics have pointed to a thicker nose and the ring on his right hand as proof it is an imposter
The Real Osama Bin Laden
What if everything we have seen or heard of him on video and audio tapes since the early days after 9/11 is a fake – and that he is being kept ‘alive’ by the Western allies to stir up support for the war on terror?
Incredibly, this is the breathtaking theory that is gaining credence among political commentators, respected academics and even terror experts.
Of course, there have been any number of conspiracy theories concerning 9/11, and it could be this is just another one.
But the weight of opinion now swinging behind the possibility that Bin Laden is dead – and the accumulating evidence that supports it – makes the notion, at the very least, worthy of examination.
The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: ‘All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.’
Osama bin Laden’s Second Death May 2011
Why is it everything related to the Osama Bin Laden killing seem like a giant pieced together cover up ? A fabricated story that they want us to believe? Did anyone else find it strange that they allegedly killed Bin Laden and disposed of the body almost immediately before they released the news of his capture to the media? Of course they used the excuse that they had to bury the body quickly as to be in accordance with Islamic tradition. But since when did the religious rights of the most vilified man in U.S. history matter? And in first reports the White house stated that the kill team and the CIA were 95% sure that they had killed Bin Laden and that the DNA evidence backs it up? Only 95% sure and you dispose of the body? One other thing, a Pakistani news paper is reporting that bin Laden had already been arrested and was in custody when he was shot in the chest and head. This would make this an execution and make Obama the judge and jury.
Then there is the ever changing story of what happened coming out of the White House. First Bin Laden was armed and fought back using his wife as a human shield. Then it changed to Bin Laden was unarmed and did not resist and did not use his wife as a shield. Every little detail of this story is in constant evolution. Since Bin Laden was not armed why did the kill team feel it necessary to allegedly shoot Bin Laden in the head? Why was he not captured alive to see his day in court? The whole world could have witnessed the trial as they did with the Nazi’s after the end of WWII. As a matter of fact the White House will not even release the identities of the kill team.
Let’s see, a dead body that was disposed of before rest of the world could see it, and the people that allegedly killed Bin Laden canl not be identified. Real convenient! There has been an endless amount of propaganda coming out dealing with the official Osama Bin Laden death narrative but there hasn’t been one shred of evidence proving that these events actually transpired as we are being told they did.
First the White House says it will release Osama Bin Laden’s death photo then the White House decides not to release the photo? Again evidence with held.
Then this media lie that Al Qaeda has confirmed Bin Ladens death by an anonymous post on a forum frequented by Al Qaeda members? How hard would it be for the CIA to plant such a post ? This fact is absolutely unproven and unconfirmed but the media is running with it like it is the absolute truth and the sheeple of the U.S. are taking it as gospel.
Another curious question is RUETERS purchased photo’s from a Pakistani security official of the men killed in the compound. The photo’s were published to the internet. Photo’s of three different men one of which was Osama Bin Laden’s son was killed. If this Pakistani official was in the compound taking pictures of the people killed how come there is no picture of Osama? Surely this Pakistani official would have taken pictures of Osama… if Osama was there.
Then there’s the recent release of Bin Ladens alleged private videos. Another strange fact is that the government has removed the audio from these videos. I can only surmise that the audio on these videos would have exposed the governments hidden reasons for releasing these videos. Sure the White house made up some grandiose excuse for removing the soundtrack from the video and once again the sheeple eat it up.
To me this entire Osama Bin Laden spectacle is a fabricated story. Not one bit of it makes any sense nor will it ever make sense. The White House is feeding us B.S. like the sheeple of the U.S. are mushrooms and we are eating it up. The government is acting like our parents did when they tried to convince us that Santa Clause was real. As a child we would question things like “well if Santa is real how does he come down the chimney without catching on fire?”. They would always come up with some story that didn’t make any sense but we as children would say “Oh, ok”. The same thing that the people of the United States are saying right now with every White House release.
